Why's The Chamber of Commerce
    protecting its sheiks?
Don't United States voters have the right to know
Who, through The Chamber, is buying elections
With unidentifiable Bahrainian dough?

No way will the FEC ever determine
How much Chamber money they raised overseas.
Thanks to Scalia's Supreme Court decision
They won't have to come clean and
    risk guilty pleas.

Is ideology or illegality worse
For a lobbying firm? Will its clients forget?
And won't Democrats
    whom The Chamber's attacked
Develop an anti-Bahrain, anti-Chamber mindset?

Surely the public is not going to trust them.
Other services offered will likely be met
With grave suspicions of fraud and deception
It's a weird reputation they're bound to regret.

Some thought The Chamber
    was the place to get help
When regular channels were not up to snuff.
But who would have guessed
    that The Chamber itself
Would ever indulge in nefarious stuff?

Bob Carlson
www.politicalboondoggles.com
On Twitter @PBoondoggles
10/7/10

To 'Clean and Open American Elections'
To 'Foreign Funded 'U.S.' Chamber of Commerce
       Running Partisan Attack Ads'

To 'Franken asks FEC to probe U.S. Chamber's funding after report'
To 'Supreme Court Decision Encourages Money-Laundering'
To 'Scalia's Court'
To 'Court's Ruling in Citizens United vs.
       Federal Election Commission'

To 'Politicians For Sale'
To 'Chamber of Commerce Money Laundering'

Click for
  more

• Chamber
  of
  Commerce

• Lobbyist
  Pimps

• Rupert
• Kochs
• Berger
• Blackmail
• Mitch